Fiche publication
Date publication
mars 2007
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr WOLF Didier
Tous les auteurs :
Dumas JL, Lorchel F, Perrot Y, Aletti P, Noel A, Wolf D, Courvoisier P, Bosset JF
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of our study was to quantify the limits of the EUD models for use in score functions in inverse planning software, and for clinical application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We focused on oesophagus cancer irradiation. Our evaluation was based on theoretical dose volume histograms (DVH), and we analyzed them using volumetric and linear quadratic EUD models, average and maximum dose concepts, the linear quadratic model and the differential area between each DVH. RESULTS: We evaluated our models using theoretical and more complex DVHs for the above regions of interest. We studied three types of DVH for the target volume: the first followed the ICRU dose homogeneity recommendations; the second was built out of the first requirements and the same average dose was built in for all cases; the third was truncated by a small dose hole. We also built theoretical DVHs for the organs at risk, in order to evaluate the limits of, and the ways to use both EUD(1) and EUD/LQ models, comparing them to the traditional ways of scoring a treatment plan. For each volume of interest we built theoretical treatment plans with differences in the fractionation. CONCLUSION: We concluded that both volumetric and linear quadratic EUDs should be used. Volumetric EUD(1) takes into account neither hot-cold spot compensation nor the differences in fractionation, but it is more sensitive to the increase of the irradiated volume. With linear quadratic EUD/LQ, a volumetric analysis of fractionation variation effort can be performed.
Référence
Phys Med. 2007 Mar;23(1):16-24
