Fiche publication
Date publication
avril 2005
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr MEYER Nicolas
Tous les auteurs :
Imbert F, Lang PO, Meyer N, Heitz D, Berthel M, Kuntzmann F
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the living conditions of disabled elderly subjects aged 75 years and more living at home. DESIGN: This study was conducted in 1996-97 in the Alsace region in France and included two parts. First, a sample survey was mailed to 15,600 subjects randomly selected from a pension funds list. This survey provided with a reliable representation of the study population in terms of disabilities using the Colvez classification. In the second part, the most disabled individuals were selected and, among them, 1,259 subjects were visited at home. Their disabilities and living conditions were noted using a predefined set of questions. RESULTS: An estimated 71,000 subjects aged 75 years and more lived at home in the study region. The vast majority were free of significant disability. Help to wash and dress was needed by 6,000 until 1,500 were bedridden or confined to an armchair. Between 4,350 and 5,400 met the criteria for iso-resource grades (IRG) 1 to 3. Disability was associated with age, female gender, cognitive impairment and some social and professional characteristics. Family support was routine in almost every aspect of everyday life including personal hygiene. Professional support was mostly limited to technical interventions. Professional nursing care concerned only the most dependent persons. Nevertheless, needs for help in home and social activities remained high even in the least dependent individuals and were strongly age-dependent. Only 10% of individuals with IRG 1 to 3 complained of inadequate help. More than 80% of the elderly felt comfortable with their living conditions at home and were not thinking of moving from home to an institution for old people. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms the important commitment of family members and their close relationships toward their elderly.
Référence
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005 Apr;53(2):153-65.
