Cross-cultural and construct validity of the Animated Activity Questionnaire.

Date publication

octobre 2016

Journal

Arthritis care & research

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr GUILLEMIN Francis

Tous les auteurs :
Peter WF, Cw de Vet H, Boers M, Harlaar J, Roorda LD, Poolman RW, Ab Scholtes V, Steultjens M, Hendry GJ, Roos EM, Guillemin F, Benedetti MG, Cavazzuti L, Escobar A, Dagfinrud H, Terwee CB

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748072

Résumé

The Animated Activity Questionnaire (AAQ) assesses activity limitations in patients with hip/knee osteoarthritis (HKOA), and consisting video animations of which patients choose the animation that best matches their own performance. The AAQ has shown good validity and reliability. This study aims to evaluate cross-cultural and construct validity of the AAQ. Methods Cross-cultural validity was assessed using ordinal logistic regression analysis to evaluate Differential Item Functioning (DIF) across 7 languages. Construct validity was assessed by testing correlations between the AAQ, and a Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) and performance-based tests.

Mots clés

Aged, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Disability Evaluation, Europe, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Hip, diagnosis, Osteoarthritis, Knee, diagnosis, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires, standards, Translations

Référence

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Oct;: