Comparison of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus para-aortic lymphadenectomy alone for locally advanced FIGO stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer using a propensity score matching analysis: Results from the FRANCOGYN study group.

Fiche publication

Date publication

août 2018

Journal

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr GRAESSLIN Olivier

Tous les auteurs :
Bendifallah S, de Foucher T, Ouldamer L, Bricou A, Lavoue V, Varinot J, Canlorbe G, Carcopino X, Raimond E, Huguet F, Graesslin O, Touboul C, Collinet P, Huchon C, Daraï E, Ballester M,

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30213717

Résumé

Pre-treatment evaluation of nodal status is crucial in women presenting with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). However, the prognostic impact of surgical staging remains to be proved, as published results comparing surgical versus radiological staging are contradictory. The aim of this study was to compare the prognosis of women with FIGO stage IB2-IIB CC who underwent surgical nodal staging including either exclusive para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) or comprehensive pelvic + para-aortic lymphadenectomy (P-PAL).