Fiche publication
Date publication
avril 2018
Journal
Bone marrow transplantation
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr FORNECKER Luc-Matthieu
Tous les auteurs :
Gauthier J, Poiré X, Gac AC, Leclerc M, Guillaume T, Chalandon Y, Nguyen S, Forcade E, Régny C, Bay JO, Bazarbachi A, Rohrlich PS, Huynh A, Farhi J, Marchand T, Malfuson JV, Pilorge S, Labussière-Wallet H, Renard C, Fornecker LM, Detrait M, Duléry R, Delage J, Ménard AL, Charbonnier A, Nelken B, Jubert C, Suarez F, de la Tour RP, Beguin Y, Schoemans H, Blaise D, Yakoub-Agha I
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
The question of the best donor type between haploidentical (HAPLO) and matched-related donors (MRD) for patients with advanced HL receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is still debated. Given the lack of data comparing these two types of donor in the setting of non-myeloablative (NMA) or reduced-intensity (RIC) allo-HCT, we performed a multicentre retrospective study using graft-vs.-host disease-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) as our primary endpoint. We analysed the data of 151 consecutive HL patients who underwent NMA or RIC allo-HCT from a HAPLO (N = 61) or MRD (N = 90) between January 2011 and January 2016. GRFS was defined as the probability of being alive without evidence of relapse, grade 3-4 acute GVHD or chronic GVHD. In multivariable analysis, MRD donors were independently associated with lower GRFS compared to HAPLO donors (HR = 2.95, P < 0.001). Disease status at transplant other than CR was also associated with lower GRFS in multivariable analysis (HR = 1.74, P = 0.01). In addition, the administration of ATG was independently linked to higher GRFS (HR = 0.52, P = 0.009). In summary, we observed significantly higher GRFS in HL patients receiving an allo-HCT using the HAPLO PT-Cy platform compared to MRD.
Référence
Bone Marrow Transplant.. 2018 Apr;53(4):400-409
