Fiche publication
Date publication
juillet 2019
Journal
Bone marrow transplantation
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr DECONINCK Eric
Tous les auteurs :
Styczynski J, Tridello G, Gil L, Ljungman P, Mikulska M, Ward KN, Cordonnier C, de la Camara R, Averbuch D, Knelange N, Socié G, Chevallier P, Blaise D, Yakoub-Agha I, Forcade E, Cornelissen J, Maertens J, Petersen E, Nguyen-Quoc S, Veelken H, Schaap N, Passweg J, Michallet M, Fegueux N, Deconinck E, Russell N, Basak G, Bader P, Montoto S, Kröger N, Cesaro S,
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
The influence of the donor (D) and recipient (R) pre-transplant Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) serostatus on transplant outcomes (overall survival, relapse-free survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, acute and chronic GVHD) in 12,931 patients with lymphomas or chronic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) between 1997-2016 was analyzed. In multivariate analysis, the risk of development of chronic GVHD was increased for EBV R+/D+ (HR = 1.26; p = 0.003), R+/D- (HR = 1.21; p = 0.044), and R-/D + (HR = 1.21; p = 0.048) in comparison to R-/D- transplants. No significance was shown for other transplant outcomes; however, in univariate analysis, EBV-seropositive patients receiving grafts from EBV-seropositive donors (EBV R+/D+transplants) had inferior transplant outcomes in comparison to EBV-seronegative recipients of grafts from EBV-seronegative donors (EBV R-/D-): inferior overall survival (59.6% vs 65.9%), inferior relapse-free survival (51.1% vs 57.5%), increased incidence of chronic GVHD (49.5% vs 41.8%), and increased incidence of de novo chronic GVHD (30.5% vs 24.0%). In conclusion, an EBV-negative recipient with lymphoma or chronic malignancy can benefit from selection of an EBV-negative donor in context of chronic GVHD, while there are no preferences in donor EBV serostatus for EBV-seropositive recipient.
Référence
Bone Marrow Transplant.. 2019 Jul 30;:
