[Comparison of the prognostic value of different clinical, angiographic and scintigraphic scores in stable coronary patients after acute coronary syndrome].

Date publication

septembre 2019

Journal

Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr COTTIN Yves , Pr COCHET Alexandre

Tous les auteurs :
Humbert O, Noirot E, Leclerc T, Mouhat B, Pommier T, Cochet A, Cottin Y

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31522776

Résumé

To date, there is no consensus regarding the follow-up of asymptomatic coronary patients with an intermediate risk of events. Indeed, most of cardiovascular events (CVE) occur in asymptomatic patients, hence the clinician's interest in establishing risk stratification scores. In asymptomatic patient, the risk assessment after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can currently be based on 3 types of score: clinical with, for example, the REACH score; angiographic with the residual SYNTAX score; imaging with different scintigraphic scores. These scores differ widely in terms of evaluation criteria and period of analysis. The aim of our study was therefore, in stable and asymptomatic coronary patients after ACS, to compare these different predictive scores; to establish that the combination of these scores makes it possible to optimize the risk assessment during the follow-up.

Mots clés

Cardiovascular events, Coronaropathie, Myocardial scintigraphy, REACH score, Risk stratification, Risque cardiovasculaire, SYNTAX score, Scintigraphie myocardique, Stable, Stable coronary patients

Référence

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2019 Sep 12;: