Clinical effectiveness of the systematic use of the GRACE scoring system (in addition to clinical assessment) for ischaemic outcomes and bleeding complications in the management of NSTEMI compared with clinical assessment alone: a prospective study.

Date publication

juin 2016

Journal

Heart and vessels

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr COTTIN Yves , Pr LORGIS Luc

Tous les auteurs :
Guenancia C, Stamboul K, Hachet O, Yameogo V, Garnier F, Gudjoncik A, Cottin Y, Lorgis L

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26047775

Résumé

We assessed the interest of systematically using the GRACE scoring system (in addition to clinical assessment) for in- hospital outcomes and bleeding complications in the management of NSTEMI compared with clinical assessments alone. Multicentre, randomized study that included 572 consecutive NSTEMI patients, randomized 1:1, into group A: clinical stratification alone and group B: clinical+ GRACE score stratification.

Mots clés

Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chi-Square Distribution, Coronary Angiography, Decision Support Techniques, Female, France, Guideline Adherence, Hemorrhage, etiology, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, complications, Odds Ratio, Patient Admission, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, adverse effects, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Time-to-Treatment, Treatment Outcome

Référence

Heart Vessels. 2016 Jun;31(6):897-906