Fiche publication


Date publication

septembre 2016

Journal

Journal of physical therapy science

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr FAVRET Fabrice , Pr GENY Bernard


Tous les auteurs :
Muff G, Dufour S, Meyer A, Severac F, Favret F, Geny B, Lecocq J, Isner-Horobeti ME

Résumé

[Purpose] To compare measurements of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength performed using a hand-held dynamometer and an isokinetic dynamometer in apparently healthy subjects. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty adult volunteers underwent knee muscle strength evaluation using an isokinetic or a hand-held dynamometer. [Results] Strong positive correlations were found between the 2 methods, with correlation coefficients r ranging from 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.86) to 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75-0.94), depending on the muscle group and the isokinetic evaluation mode. The reproducibility of the hand-held dynamometer findings was good, judged by a coefficient of variation of 3.2-4.2%. However, the correlation between the 2 methods for the assessment of flexor/extensor ratios ranged from -0.04 to 0.46. [Conclusion] Knee extensor and flexor muscle strength recorded with a hand-held dynamometer is reproducible and significantly correlated with the isokinetic values, indicating that this method may in some cases be a useful replacement for isokinetic strength measurement. However, for strength ratio assessment, and when judged against the isokinetic standard, a hand-held dynamometer is not a valid option.

Mots clés

Dynamometer, Muscle, Strength

Référence

J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Sep;28(9):2445-2451