Robotic-assisted right colectomy. Official expert recommendations delivered under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC).

Fiche publication

Date publication

juin 2022

Journal

Journal of visceral surgery

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr PESSAUX Patrick , Dr LAKKIS Zaher

Tous les auteurs :
de'Angelis N, Micelli Lupinacci R, Abdalla S, Genova P, Beliard A, Cotte E, Denost Q, Goasguen N, Lakkis Z, Lelong B, Manceau G, Meurette G, Perrenot C, Pezet D, Rouanet P, Valverde A, Pessaux P,

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35599158

Résumé

Twenty-seven experts under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC) offer this reference system with formalized recommendations concerning the performance of right colectomy by robotic approach (RRC). For RRC, experts suggest patient installation in the so-called "classic" or "suprapubic" setup. For patients undergoing right colectomy for a benign pathology or cancer, RRC provides no significant benefit in terms of intra-operative blood loss, intra-operative complications or conversion rate to laparotomy compared to laparoscopy. At the same time, RRC is associated with significantly longer operating times. Data from the literature are insufficient to define whether the robot facilitates the performance of an intra-abdominal anastomosis, but the robotic approach is more frequently associated with an intra-abdominal anastomosis than the laparoscopic approach. Experts also suggest that RRC offers a benefit in terms of post-operative morbidity compared to right colectomy by laparotomy. No benefit is retained in terms of mortality, duration of hospital stay, histological results, overall survival or disease-free survival in RRC performed for cancer. In addition, RRC should not be performed based on the cost/benefit ratio, since RRC is associated with significantly higher costs than laparoscopy and laparotomy. Future research in the field of RRC should consider the evaluation of patient-targeted parameters such as pain or quality of life and the technical advantages of the robot for complex procedural steps, as well as surgical and oncological results.