Fiche publication


Date publication

décembre 2016

Journal

Nephrologie & therapeutique

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr DORY Anne


Tous les auteurs :
Parmier M, Gourieux B, Krummel T, Bazin-Kara D, Dory A, Hannedouche T

Résumé

The treatment of end-stage renal disease requires a significant number of drug treatments. At patient level, daily management is somewhat difficult: Number of prescribed pills, medication side effects, treatment of asymptomatic diseases… The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of guidance tailored to each patient receiving hemodialysis, performed by the pharmacist (educational interventions). Adult haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia despite phosphate binders were eligible for study entry. The study was controlled with a retrospective group. The primary end point was a change in serum phosphate levels. The secondary end points were therapy adherence, knowledge regarding phosphate management and patient satisfaction with the programme. Sixteen patients in each group participated in the study. The mean serum phosphate level at endpoint was decreased by 0.25 mmol/L in the intervention group (0.41 mmol/L for patients with expectancy for this reduction) and by 0.11 mmol/L in the control group. Five patients normalized their serum phosphate level in the intervention group against three patients in the control group. The mean score of adherence decreased from 1.75 to 1.50. The main factors affecting adherence were forgetfulness or carelessness in taking medications and number of daily doses. This study showed the feasibility of an improvement in serum phosphate level and adherence driven by therapeutic education, though effect was highly amplified by the motivation induced by pharmaceutical guidance. Patients emphasize the importance of the involvement of pharmacist in their care.

Mots clés

Educational intervention, Haemodialysis, Hémodialyse, Intervention éducative, Médicaments chélateurs de phosphate, Phosphate binders

Référence

Nephrol Ther. 2016 12;12(7):516-524