Fiche publication
Date publication
février 2016
Journal
Neuro-Chirurgie
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr PROUST François
Tous les auteurs :
Thines L, Proust F, Marinho P, Durand A, van der Zwan A, Regli L, Lejeune JP
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Due to their anatomical characteristics and the complexity of the procedures required to obtain their complete occlusion, the treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms is a real challenge. Direct reconstructive strategies, whether by interventional neuroradiology (coils, stents) or microsurgical (clipping) means, are not always applicable and, in patients that would not tolerate parent or collateral artery sacrifice, the adjunction of a revascularization procedure using a bypass technique might be necessary. Cerebral arterial bypasses can be classified according to their function (3 types: flow replacement, flow reversal or protective), the branching mode of the graft used (3 types: pedicled, interpositional or in situ), the sites of anastomosis (2 types: extracranial-intracranial or intracranial-intracranial) and the class of flow they are supposed to provide (3 types: low-, intermediate- or high-flow). In this article, the authors review the different aspects in the management of patients with a giant intracranial aneurysm using a bypass: preoperative work-up, types of bypass and indications, surgical techniques and results.
Mots clés
Anévrisme géant intracrânien, Clippage, Clipping, Conventional bypass, Diversion de flux, ELANA, Extracranial-intracranial bypass, Flow diversion, Giant intracranial aneurysm, Intracranial-intracranial bypass, Nonocclusive bypass, Pontage conventionnel, Pontage extracrânien-intracrânien, Pontage intracrânien-intracrânien, Pontage non occlusif, Pontage radial, Pontage saphène, Radial artery bypass, Saphenous vein bypass, Stent, Stenting
Référence
Neurochirurgie. 2016 02;62(1):1-13
