Women and health professionals' perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study.

Date publication

mars 2023

Journal

BMJ open

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr BARDOU Marc , Dr MEUNIER-BEILLARD Nicolas

Tous les auteurs :
Bardou M, Meunier-Beillard N, Godard-Marceau A, Deruelle P, Virtos C, Eckman-Lacroix A, Debras E, Schmitz T,

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36990483

Résumé

Women of low socioeconomic status have been described as having suboptimal prenatal care, which in turn has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Many types of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been developed, including programmes to improve prenatal care or smoking cessation during pregnancy, and their effects demonstrated. However, ethical critiques have included paternalism and lack of informed choice. Our objective was to determine if women and healthcare professionals (HPs) shared these concerns.

Mots clés

ethics (see medical ethics), health policy, organisation of health services, reproductive medicine

Référence

BMJ Open. 2023 03 29;13(3):e067066