Fiche publication
Date publication
juillet 2023
Journal
Bone marrow transplantation
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr BERCEANU Ana
Tous les auteurs :
Gavriilaki E, Sakellari I, Labopin M, Bornhäuser M, Hamladji RM, Casper J, Edinger M, Zák P, Yakoub-Agha I, Ciceri F, Schroeder T, Zuckerman T, Kobbe G, Yeshurun M, Narni F, Finke J, Diez-Martin JL, Berceanu A, Hilgendorf I, Verbeek M, Olivieri A, Savani B, Spyridonidis A, Nagler A, Mohty M
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
We compared FT14 (fludarabine 150-160 mg/m, treosulfan 42 g/m) versus FB4 (fludarabine 150-160 mg/m, busulfan 12.8 mg/kg) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transplanted at primary refractory/relapsed disease. We retrospectively studied: (a) adults diagnosed with AML, (b) recipients of first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from unrelated/sibling donor (2010-2020), (c) HSCT with primary refractory/relapsed disease, (d) conditioning regimen with FT14 or FB4. We studied 346 patients, 113 transplanted with FT14, and 233 with FΒ4. FT14 patients were significantly older, more frequently had an unrelated donor and had received a lower dose of fludarabine. Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade III-IV and extensive chronic GVHD was similar. With a median follow-up of 28.7 months, 2-year CI of relapse was 43.4% in FT14 versus 53.2% in FB4, while non-relapse mortality (NRM) was respectively 20.8% versus 22.6%. This led to 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) of 35.8% for FT14 versus 24.2% in FB4, and overall survival (OS) of 44.4% versus 34%. Adverse cytogenetics and conditioning regimen independently predicted CI of relapse. Furthermore, conditioning regimen was the only independent predictor of LFS, OS, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival. Therefore, our real-world multicenter study suggests that FT14 is associated with better outcomes in primary refractory/relapsed AML.
Référence
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023 07 7;: