Fiche publication


Date publication

août 2023

Journal

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr ROY Catherine , Pr SAULEAU Erik-André , Pr OHANA Mickaël


Tous les auteurs :
Kepka S, Heimann C, Severac F, Hoffbeck L, Le Borgne P, Bayle E, Ruch Y, Muller J, Roy C, Sauleau EA, Andres E, Ohana M, Bilbault P

Résumé

Chest radiography remains the most frequently used examination in emergency departments (ED) for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), despite its poor diagnostic accuracy compared with ultra-low-dose (ULD) chest computed tomography (CT). However, although ULD CT appears to be an attractive alternative to radiography, its organizational impact in ED remains unknown. Our objective was to compare the relevant timepoints in ED management of CT and chest radiography. We conducted a retrospective study in two ED of a University Hospital including consecutive patients consulting for a CAP between 1 March 2019 and 29 February 2020 to assess the organizational benefits of ULD chest CT and chest radiography (length of stay (LOS) in the ED, time of clinical decision after imaging). Overlap weights (OW) were used to reduce covariate imbalance between groups. Chest radiography was performed for 1476 patients (mean age: 76 years [63; 86]; 55% men) and ULD chest CT for 133 patients (mean age: 71 [57; 83]; 53% men). In the weighted population with OW, ULD chest CT did not significantly alter the ED LOS compared with chest radiography (11.7 to 12.2; MR 0.96 [0.85; 1.09]), although it did significantly reduce clinical decision time (6.9 and 9.5 h; MR 0.73 [0.59; 0.89]). There is real-life evidence that a strategy with ULD chest CT can be considered to be a relevant approach to replace chest radiography as part of the diagnostic workup for CAP in the ED without increasing ED LOS.

Mots clés

chest radiography, community-acquired pneumonia, emergency department, ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography

Référence

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 08 22;59(9):