Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?

Date publication

octobre 2023

Journal

World journal of urology

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr TRICARD Thibault

Tous les auteurs :
Cousin T, Peyronnet B, Bentellis I, Lasri S, Taha F, Hermieu N, Boileau A, Zelmar A, Ciolek C, Dubois A, Leon P, Hermieu JF, Brierre T, Gamé X, Tricard T, Saussine C, Lecoanet P, Vidart A, Bruyère F, Cornu JN, Monsaint H, Biardeau X, Capon G

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37902863

Résumé

Persistence or recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (prSUI) after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation may be secondary to non-mechanical failure (NOMECA). It have for long been assumed to result from urethral atrophy. Its existence is now debated. As the pathophysiology of NOMECA is not elucidated, the most appropriate management remains unclear. We aimed to compare the several revision techniques for NOMECA of AUS in men.

Mots clés

Artificial urinary sphincter, Failure, Non-mechanical failure, Revision, Urethral atrophy, Urinary incontinence

Référence

World J Urol. 2023 10 30;: