Fiche publication
Date publication
novembre 2023
Journal
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Drainage after total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) used to be systematic, to prevent complications and notably hematoma and infection. However, improvement in practices, the introduction of blood-sparing protocols and above all the conclusions reported in many studies have cast doubt on this dogma. There is abundant literature on the pros and cons of drainage after primary THA and TKA. The main endpoints were transfusion rates and volumes, total blood loss and variations in hemoglobin levels. Clinical endpoints comprised pain, edema, postoperative hematoma and, more rarely, short-to-medium-term function. Except for a few studies reporting greater pain and edema without drainage, there is agreement that drainage not only provides no benefit but actually aggravates postoperative bleeding. There are fewer studies of drainage in revision procedures for the hip, and very few for the knee. The interest of drainage has not been demonstrated, and again postoperative bleeding is aggravated. Whether in primary or revision arthroplasty, tranexamic acid is recommended when not contraindicated, whatever the administration protocol. However, it should not be seen as the sole and determining reason for abandoning drainage. Level of evidence: V, expert opinion.
Mots clés
Drainage, blood loss, complications, hematoma, total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty
Référence
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 11 16;:103764
