Use of qualitative methods to optimize collaborative practices by highlighting differences in perceptions between professionals: an example of patient education.

Fiche publication

Date publication

février 2024

Journal

Journal of interprofessional care

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr MINARY Laetitia

Tous les auteurs :
Ricci L, Minary L, Kivits J, Ayav C, Rat AC

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38375794

Résumé

Interprofessional working must be approached within health promotion interventions using systematic methods to identify areas of suboptimal collaboration. We designed a qualitative study with a purposive sample of seven French therapeutic patient education programs. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 14 healthcare providers and seven clinician leaders (coordinators) involved in patient education. We used the same interview guide and thematic grid regardless of the professional's profile to compare their perceptions on elements affecting outcome, participation and sustainability of programs. Healthcare providers and coordinators addressed non-convergent issues at both ends of a continuum from a micro-level nested in the program delivery to a macro-level corresponding to the structured implementation and sustainability of the program. Meso-level issues featured convergent perspectives. Our methodology could be used at the level of health services in a health system to provide a complete recovery of stakeholders' perspectives (without "blind spots" from one stakeholder or another). In our study, we focused on patient education in the French health system and pointed out possible considerations to optimize the functioning of programs. Such considerations include specific training plan development, encouraging reflection on the content and use of initial assessment, leading sessions in pairs to save on work time, and communication on the ins and outs of organizational imperatives that require healthcare providers' contributions.