PIT-EASY survey: validation of the European Pituitary Pathology Group proposal for reporting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

Fiche publication

Date publication

juin 2024

Journal

Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr BOULAGNON-ROMBI Camille , Pr GAUCHOTTE Guillaume

Tous les auteurs :
Birtolo MF, Jouinot A, Vasiljevic A, Boulagnon-Rombi C, Asioli S, Bousdira G, Tetka LMM, Perbet R, Maurage CA, Appay R, Figarella-Branger D, Gauchotte G, Sturm N, Baussart B, Roncaroli F, Bertherat J, Brue T, Villa C,

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38907774

Résumé

The aim of this multicenter prospective survey called PIT-EASY was to assess the relevance of the European Pituitary Pathology Group (EPPG) diagnostic tools for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) to improve the quality of their histological diagnosis. Each center performed at least 30 histological cases of PitNETs using the EPPG tools and assessed their value using a scorecard with 10 questions. For each center, the histological cases were carried out by pathologists with varying levels of expertise in pituitary pathology defined as junior, intermediate, and expert. Two hundred and ninety histological cases were collected from six French and Italian centers. The three EPPG tools were validated and regarded as helpful for a more accurate and time-efficient diagnosis. The usefulness of level 2 and level 3 of the "EPPG's multi-step approach for immunohistochemistry" including pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, and SF1) and chromogranin, SSTRs, and P53 respectively was higher in "other non-functioning" (silent plurihormonal PIT1, silent corticotroph, and null cell): 88% vs 32%, p < 10-6 and 42% vs 14%, p = 0.002, respectively. The diagnostic algorithm proved more useful for junior pathologists (p = 0.0001) and those with intermediate experience. PIT-EASY survey confirmed the importance of a standardized approach to PitNETs for an accurate and reproducible diagnosis and served as validation of the EPPG proposal. The tool appeared to be of practical value to junior participants and staff with intermediate experience for safe routine diagnostic reporting.