Fiche publication
Date publication
août 2024
Journal
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr AKLADIOS Chérif
Tous les auteurs :
Spiers A, Roman H, Wasson M, Chapron C, Rousset P, Golfier F, Fauvet R, Delbos L, Poilblanc M, Lavoué V, Petit E, Perotte F, Benjoar M, Akladios C, Merlot B, Dennis T, Boudy AS, Fedida B, Leguevaque P, Genre L, Hennetier C, Perrin M, Crochet P, Lucas N, Roger CM, Chantalat E, Collinet P, Fernandez H, Descamps P, Bendifallah S
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Endometriosis is a complex gynecologic disorder characterized primarily by symptoms of pelvic pain, infertility, and altered quality of life. National and international guidelines highlight the diagnostic difficulties and lack of conclusive diagnostic tools for endometriosis. Furthermore, guidelines are becoming questionable at an increasingly rapid rate as new diagnostic techniques emerge. This work aims to provide a knowledge synthesis of the relevance of various diagnostic tools and to assess areas of improvement of conventional algorithms. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 2021 to December 2023 using relevant key words. Articles evaluating the diagnostic relevance and performance of various tools were included and independently reviewed by the authors for eligibility. Included studies were assessed using the GRADE and QUADAS-2 tools. Of the 4204 retrieved articles, 26 were included. While anamnesis and clinical examination do contribute to diagnostic accuracy, their level of evidence and impact on the diagnostic process remains limited. Although imaging techniques are recommended to investigate endometriosis, ultrasonography remains highly operator dependent. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to exhibit higher sensitivities than ultrasound. However, concerns persist with regards to the terminology, anatomical definition of lesions, and accuracies of both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, several biological markers have been studied and cumulative evidence supports the contribution of noncoding RNAs to the diagnosis of endometriosis. Marginal improvements have been suggested for anamnesis, clinical examination, and imaging examinations. Conversely, some biomarkers, including the saliva microRNA signature for endometriosis, have emerged as diagnostic tools which inspire reflection on the revision of conventional diagnostic algorithms.
Mots clés
anamnesis, biomarkers, clinical examination, endometriosis diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound
Référence
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 08 20;: