Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy or Everolimus in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: The SeqEveRIV Study, a National Study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors and Endocan-RENATEN Network.

Fiche publication

Date publication

août 2024

Journal

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr LEPAGE Côme

Tous les auteurs :
Fosse A, Hadoux J, Girot P, Beron A, Afchain P, Cottereau AS, Baudin E, Dierickx LO, Lecomte T, Perrier M, Lepage C, Bouhier-Leporrier K, Goichot B, Lachachi B, Walter T, Durand A

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39089810

Résumé

Everolimus and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT, Lu-DOTATATE) are 2 treatments recommended in guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, the best treatment sequence remains unknown. We designed a retrospective multicenter study that included patients from the national prospective database of the Groupe d'Étude des Tumeurs Endocrines who had been treated using everolimus and PRRT between April 2004 and October 2022. The primary aim was to compare the 2 treatments (everolimus and PRRT) in terms of efficacy and safety, and the secondary aim was to evaluate the sequences (PRRT followed by everolimus or everolimus followed by PRRT) based on overall progression-free survival (PFS) (PFS during first treatment + PFS during second treatment) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Both treatments were used for 84 patients. The objective response rate and median PFS were 5 mo (6.0%) and 16.1 mo (95% CI, 11.5-20.7 mo), respectively, under everolimus and 19 mo (22.6%) and 24.5 mo (95% CI, 17.7-31.3 mo), respectively, for PRRT. The safety profile was also better for PRRT. Median overall PFS was 43.2 mo (95% CI, 33.7-52.7 mo) for the everolimus-PRRT sequence and 30.6 mo (95% CI, 17.8-43.4 mo) for the PRRT-everolimus sequence (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.39-1.24; = 0.22). PRRT was more effective and less toxic than everolimus. Overall PFS was similar between the 2 sequences, suggesting case-by-case discussion if the patient is eligible for both treatments, but PRRT should be used first when an objective response is needed or in frail populations.