Fiche publication
Date publication
janvier 2013
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr BEZDETNAYA-BOLOTINE Lina
Tous les auteurs :
Reshetov V, Lassalle HP, Francois A, Dumas D, Hupont S, Grafe S, Filipe V, Jiskoot W, Guillemin F, Zorin V, Bezdetnaya L
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
A major challenge in the application of a nanoparticle-based drug delivery system for anticancer agents is the knowledge of the critical properties that influence their in vivo behavior and the therapeutic performance of the drug. The effect of a liposomal formulation, as an example of a widely-used delivery system, on all aspects of the drug delivery process, including the drug's behavior in blood and in the tumor, has to be considered when optimizing treatment with liposomal drugs, but that is rarely done. This article presents a comparison of conventional (Foslip(R)) and polyethylene glycosylated (Fospeg(R)) liposomal formulations of temoporfin (meta-tetra[hydroxyphenyl]chlorin) in tumor-grafted mice, with a set of comparison parameters not reported before in one model. Foslip(R) and Fospeg(R) pharmacokinetics, drug release, liposome stability, tumor uptake, and intratumoral distribution are evaluated, and their influence on the efficacy of the photodynamic treatment at different light-drug intervals is discussed. The use of whole-tumor multiphoton fluorescence macroscopy imaging is reported for visualization of the in vivo intratumoral distribution of the photosensitizer. The combination of enhanced permeability and retention-based tumor accumulation, stability in the circulation, and release properties leads to a higher efficacy of the treatment with Fospeg(R) compared to Foslip(R). A significant advantage of Fospeg(R) lies in a major decrease in the light-drug interval, while preserving treatment efficacy.
Référence
Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:3817-31
