Fiche publication
Date publication
mai 2011
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr BENSOUSSAN Danièle
,
Pr DECOT Véronique
,
Dr D'AVENI-PINEY Maud
Tous les auteurs :
D'Aveni M, Aissi-Rothe L, Venard V, Salmon A, Falenga A, Decot V, Virion JM, Wang Y, Clement L, Latger-Cannard V, Tomowiak C, Stoltz JF, Bordigoni P, Bensoussan D
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Monitoring of EBV DNAemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is necessary, but not sufficient, to identify patients at risk of EBV-induced post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). Combining this with quantifying EBV-specific cellular immunity was shown to be helpful. In this study, we evaluated the value of IFNgamma-Elispot assay in monitoring EBV DNAemia after HSCT. METHODS: EBV-DNA load in whole blood was monitored at least weekly using real-time PCR in 40 recipients of HSCT. Quantitative and qualitative T-cell recoveries, including EBV-specific T-cell quantification by Elispot assay, were studied 60, 100, 180 and 360 days after HSCT. RESULTS: Among the 35 evaluable patients, 14 (35%) presented EBV DNAemia, only 2/14 (14%) needing pre-emptive treatment with rituximab. The greatest risk factor for EBV DNAemia was the presence of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (p=0.005). EBV-specific cellular immune recovery was monitored by IFNgamma-Elispot assay. Using multivariate analysis, four factors were found to significantly influence IFNgamma-Elispot results at defined times post-HSCT: EBV DNAemia, young age, global T-cell recovery and severe acute GVHD. In those cases where EBV DNAemia occurred and cleared spontaneously, Elispot results gave more than 1000 spot-forming cells (SFC)/10(6)PBMC. CONCLUSION: Elispot assay may be usefully combined with EBV-DNA load monitoring to determine when a patient should receive pre-emptive treatment, or when the clinician should avoid Rituximab use which severely immunocompromises patients.
Référence
Transpl Immunol. 2011 May;24(4):224-32
