Is the need for an arterial resection a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A case-matched controlled study.

Date publication

janvier 2011

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr BACHELLIER Philippe , Pr PESSAUX Patrick

Tous les auteurs :
Bachellier P, Rosso E, Lucescu I, Oussoultzoglou E, Tracey J, Pessaux P, Ferreira N, Jaeck D

Lien Pubmed

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21105000

Résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Arterial resection (AR) has traditionally been considered as a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The objective was to evaluate if pancreatic resection with AR was worthwhile. METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2008 the records of 26 consecutive patients who underwent a curative-intent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with AR (AR+ group) were matched 1:1 to those of the whole series of pancreatic resection performed in our institution. The final study population (n = 52) included two groups of patients: the study group AR+ = 26 and the control group AR- = 26. RESULTS: The 1- and 3-year survival rates were similar in the two groups (65.9% and 22.1%, median 17 months for the group AR + , versus 50.0% and 17.6%, median 12 months, for the group AR-; P = 0.581). The multivariate analysis showed that: arterial wall invasion at the site of AR, the total number of resected lymph nodes of

Référence

J Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan 1;103(1):75-84.