Fiche publication
Date publication
mars 2015
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr AUBRY Régis
Tous les auteurs :
Riou F, Aubry R, Pontone S, Pennec S
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
CONTEXT: The debate on the decriminalization of active assistance in dying is still a topical issue in many countries where it is regarded as homicide. Despite the prohibition, some physicians say they have used drugs to intentionally end a patient's life. OBJECTIVES: To provide some empirical grounding for the ongoing debate. METHODS: Using data from the End-of-Life in France survey (a representative sample of 15,000 deaths that occurred in December 2009, questionnaires completed anonymously by the physicians who had certified the deaths), we selected all the cases where the physician had "used one or more drugs to intentionally end a patient's life," and compared the decisions and decision-making process with the conditions imposed by French law for decisions to withhold or withdraw life-supporting treatments, and by the Belgian law on euthanasia. RESULTS: Of the 36 cases analyzed, four situations seemed to be deliberate acts following explicit requests from the patients, and only two seemed to fulfil the eligibility and due care conditions of the Belgian euthanasia law. Decisions made without any discussion with patients were quite common, and we observed inadequate labeling, frequent signs of ambivalence (artificial feeding and hydration not withdrawn, types of drug used) and little inter-professional consultation. Where the patient had requested euthanasia, the emotional burden on the physician was heavy. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the pressing need for a clarification of the concepts involved among health professionals, patients and society at large, and better training and support for physicians.
Référence
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Mar 28. pii: S0885-3924(15)00158-X
