Induced membrane maintains its osteogenic properties even when the second stage of Masquelet's technique is performed later.
Fiche publication
Date publication
juillet 2019
Journal
European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr AUBER Frédéric, Dr GINDRAUX Florelle
Tous les auteurs :
Gindraux F, Loisel F, Bourgeois M, Oudina K, Melin M, de Billy B, Sergent P, Leclerc G, Petite H, Auber F, Obert L, Pluvy I
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Previous clinical studies have shown the effectiveness of bone repair using two-stage surgery called the induced membrane (IM) technique. The optimal wait before the second surgery is said to be 1 month. We have been successfully performing the IM technique while waiting an average of 6 months to carry out the second stage. We hypothesised that the IM maintains its beneficial capabilities, even at a later second stage, and that there is no relation between the speed of bone union and the wait between the first and second stage. We sought to explore the biological properties of 'older' IMs sampled to substantiate our clinical observations.
Mots clés
Bone union, Experimental studies, Induced membrane, Multipotent tissue
Référence
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Jul 18;: