Comparison of two transarterial chemoembolization strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Fiche publication
Date publication
décembre 2014
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr FAGNONI Philippe, Pr HILLON Patrick
Tous les auteurs :
Tavernier J, Fagnoni P, Chabrot P, Guiu B, Vadot L, Aho S, Boyer L, Abergel A, Hillon P, Sautou V, Boulin M
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
AIM: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of and tolerance to two center-related conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) strategies in the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All HCC patients in whom TACE was initiated in the two centers from June 2008 to July 2011 were included. The TACE strategy performed in center 1 was "on demand" with selective injections of idarubicin, whereas the TACE strategy in center 2 was based "on scheduled" non-selective injections of epirubicin. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty HCC patients were included. Median time to treatment failure was significantly higher in center 1, 13.1 months vs. 7.9 months in center 2 (hazard ratio, 2.32; p/= 3 adverse events and mean hospitalisation duration for the overall TACE treatment were significantly greater in center 2 than in center 1: 56% vs. 32% (p
Référence
Anticancer Res. 2014 Dec;34(12):7247-53.