Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Cetuximab Radiotherapy Is Not Superior to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Carcinomas: Results of the GORTEC 2007-02 Phase III Randomized Trial.
Fiche publication
Date publication
juillet 2018
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr BOREL Christian, Dr GEOFFROIS Lionnel, Dr KAMINSKY Marie-Christine
Tous les auteurs :
Geoffrois L, Martin L, De Raucourt D, Sun XS, Tao Y, Maingon P, Buffet J, Pointreau Y, Sire C, Tuchais C, Babin E, Coutte A, Rolland F, Kaminsky MC, Alfonsi M, Lapeyre M, Saliou M, Lafond C, Jadaud E, Gery B, Zawadi A, Tourani JM, Khoury C, Henry AR, Hasbini A, Guichard F, Borel C, Meert N, Guillet P, Calais MH, Garaud P, Bourhis J
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Purpose Both concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) and cetuximab radiotherapy (cetux-RT) have been established as the standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. It was not known whether the addition of induction chemotherapy before cetux-RT could improve outcomes compared with standard of care CT-RT. Patients and Methods The current trial was restricted to patients with nonmetastatic N2b, N2c, or N3 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and fit for taxotere, cisplatin, fluorouracil (TPF). Patients were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of TPF followed by cetux-RT versus concurrent carboplatin fluorouracil and RT as recommended in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The trial was powered to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 in favor of TPF plus cetux-RT for progression-free survival at 2 years. The inclusion of 180 patients per arm was needed to achieve 80% power at a two-sided significance level of .05. Results Between 2009 and 2013, 370 patients were included. All patients and tumors characteristics were well balanced between arms. There were more cases of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in the induction arm, and the induction TPF was associated with 6.6% treatment-related deaths. With a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 2-year progression-free survival was not different between both arms (CT-RT, 0.38 v TPF + cetux-RT, 0.36; HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.20]; P = .58). HR was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.3; P = .90) for locoregional control and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.46; P = .39) for overall survival. These effects were observed regardless of p16 status. The rate of distant metastases was lower in the TPF arm (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.99]; P = .05). Conclusion Induction TPF followed by cetux-RT did not improve outcomes compared with CT-RT in a population of patients with advanced cervical lymphadenopathy.
Référence
J. Clin. Oncol.. 2018 Jul 17;:JCO2017762591