Comparative study between biologic porcine dermal meshes: risk factors of postoperative morbidity and recurrence.
Fiche publication
Date publication
juin 2016
Journal
Journal of wound care
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr MEYER Nicolas, Pr ROHR Serge, Dr ROMAIN Benoit, Pr BRIGAND Cécile
Tous les auteurs :
Romain B, Story F, Meyer N, Delhorme JB, Brigand C, Rohr S
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Different types of biologic mesh have been introduced as an alternative to synthetic mesh for use in repairing contaminated ventral hernias because of their biocompatible nature. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent complex ventral hernia repairs with either non cross-linked or cross-linked porcine dermal meshes.
Mots clés
Adult, Aged, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Collagen, Databases, Factual, Female, Hernia, Ventral, surgery, Herniorrhaphy, methods, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, epidemiology, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis-Related Infections, epidemiology, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Seroma, epidemiology, Surgical Mesh, Surgical Wound Infection, epidemiology, Swine, Treatment Outcome
Référence
J Wound Care. 2016 Jun;25(6):320-5