Self-controlled case series and misclassification bias induced by case selection from administrative hospital databases: application to febrile convulsions in pediatric vaccine pharmacoepidemiology.
Fiche publication
Date publication
décembre 2013
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr QUANTIN Catherine, Pr VELTEN Michel
Tous les auteurs :
Quantin C, Benzenine E, Velten M, Huet F, Farrington CP, Tubert-Bitter P
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Vaccine safety studies are increasingly conducted by using administrative health databases and self-controlled case series designs that are based on cases only. Often, several criteria are available to define the cases, which may yield different positive predictive values, as well as different sensitivities, and therefore different numbers of selected cases. The question then arises as to which is the best case definition. This article proposes new methodology to guide this choice based on the bias of the relative incidence and the power of the test. We apply this methodology in a validation study of 4 nested algorithms for identifying febrile convulsions from the administrative databases of 10 French hospitals. We used a sample of 695 children aged 1 month to 3 years who were hospitalized in 2008-2009 with at least 1 diagnosis code of febrile convulsions. The positive predictive values of the algorithms ranged from 81% to 98%, and their sensitivities were estimated to be 47%-99% in data from 1 large hospital. When applying our proposed methods, the algorithm we selected used a restricted diagnosis code and position on the discharge abstract. These criteria, which resulted in the selection of 502 cases with a positive predictive value of 95%, provided the best compromise between high power and low relative bias.
Référence
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec 15;178(12):1731-9