Absorbable Polyglactin vs. Non-Cross-linked Porcine Biological Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Infected Incisional Hernia.
Fiche publication
Date publication
février 2020
Journal
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Mme HENRIQUES Julie
Tous les auteurs :
Renard Y, de Mestier L, Henriques J, de Boissieu P, de Mestier P, Fingerhut A, Palot JP, Kianmanesh R
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
The use of absorbable meshes during contaminated or infected incisional hernia (IH) repair is associated with high morbidity and recurrence rates. Biological meshes might be more appropriate but have been described in highly heterogeneous series. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy of absorbable vs. biological meshes for the treatment of contaminated or infected IH in a homogeneous series with a standardized technique.
Mots clés
Acellular dermis, Collagen/therapeutic use, Extracellular matrix, Hernia, Herniorrhaphy/methods, Surgical mesh, Surgical wound infection/epidemiology, Surgical wound infection/prevention and control, Ventral/surgery, Wound healing
Référence
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 02;24(2):435-443